If a hazelnut had the shell of a cocoanut, its meat would, in my opinion, sustain about the same relation to its bulk as the gist of the usual legal proceeding sustains to the mass of verbiage in which it is enshrouded.For this reason you will not expect me to give a detailed account of this trial.I couldn't if I would, and I wouldn't if I could.My knowledge of legal procedure is far from profound, albeit I once began the study of law.My memories of Blackstone are such as need prejudice no ambitious aspirant for legal honours.I have a recollection that somewhere Blackstone says something about eavesdropping, - I mean in its literal sense - something about the drippings from A's roof falling on B's estate; but for the life of me I couldn't tell what he says.More distinctly do I remember this learned lawgiver stated that there could be no doubt of the evidence of witchcraft, because the Bible was full of it, and that witches should be punished with death.This made an impression upon me, because it was an instance, rare to me then, but common enough now, of how minds, otherwise exceptionally able, may have a spot so encankered with creed, bigotry, and superstition as to render their judgments respecting certain classes of phenomena erroneous and illogical, puerile and ridiculous.
But to return to those points of the trial which I can remember, and which I think of sufficient interest to put before you.These refer chiefly to Maitland's examination of M.Latour, and of the government's chief witness, M.Godin.Such portions of their testimony as I shall put before you I shall quote exactly as it was given and reported by Maitland's friend, Simonds.
When Maitland began for the defence he said:
"At about half-past seven on the night of the 22d of April, John Darrow met his death at his home in Dorchester.He died in the presence of his daughter, Messrs.Willard, Browne, Herne, and myself.His death was caused by injecting a virulent poison into his system through a slight incision in his neck.That wound the prisoner before you confesses he himself inflicted.I would like to know a little more definitely how he succeeded in doing it without detection, in the presence, not only of his victim, but of five other persons sitting close about him.M.Latour will please take the stand."As M.Latour stepped into the witness-box, a wave of suppressed excitement ran all over the court-room.Every nerve was strained to its tensest pitch, every ear eager for the slightest syllable he might utter.What could be done for a man who had confessed, and what would be the solution of the crime which had so long defied the authorities? The explanation was now to be made and it is no wonder that the excitement was intense.
I omit all uninteresting formalities.
Q.Have you ever seen me before to-day?
A.Not to my knowledge.
Q.Have you any reason to believe I have ever seen you before to-day?
A.None whatever - er - that is - unless on the night of the murder.
Q.Were you acquainted with John Darrow?
A.Yes.
Q.How long have you known him?
A.About six months - perhaps seven.
Q.What were your relations?
A.I don't understand.- We had gambled together.
Q.Where?
A.In this city - Decatur Street.=20
Q.What motive led you to kill him?
A.He cheated me at cards, and I swore to be even with him.
Q.Had you any other reason?
A.I owed him twelve hundred and thirty-five dollars which Iborrowed of him hoping my luck would change.He won it all back from me by false play, and when I could not meet it he pressed me over hard.
Q.You say this occurred on Decatur Street.What was the date?
A.I do not remember.
Q.What month was it?
A.It was in March.Early in March.
Q.You are sure it was in March?
A.Yes.
Q.Should you say it was between the 1st and 15th of March?
A.Yes.I am positive it was before the 15th of March.
Q.Have you long known that M.Godin was at work upon this case?
A.No.
Q.When did you first become aware of it?
A.Not until my arrest.
Q.When did you first see M.Godin?
A.When I was arrested.
Q.Did he ever call at your rooms?
A.Never - not to my knowledge - I never saw him till the day of my arrest.
Q.With what weapon did you kill Mr.Darrow?
A.I made use of a specially constructed hypodermic syringe.
Half-smothered exclamations of surprise were heard from every part of the room.Even the Judge gave a start at this astounding bit of testimony.Every person present knew perfectly well that no human being could have entered or left the Darrow parlour without certain discovery, yet here was a man, apparently in his right mind, who soberly asserted that he had used a hypodermic syringe.Maitland and Godin alone seemed cool and collected.Throughout all Latour's testimony, M.Godin watched the witness with a burning concentration.It seemed as if the great detective meant to bore through Latour's gaze down to the most secret depths of his soul.Not for an instant did he take his eyes from Latour.I said to myself at the time that this power of concentration explained, in a great measure, this detective's remarkable success.Nothing was permitted to escape him, and little movements which anotherman would doubtless never notice, had, for M.Godin, I felt sure, a world of suggestive significance.
Maitland's calm demeanour, so resourceful in its serenity, caused all eyes to turn at length to him as if for explanation.He continued with slow deliberation.
Q.In what particulars was this hypodermic syringe of special construction?
M.Latour seemed nervous and ill at ease.He shifted from side to side as if M.Godin's glance had pierced him like a rapier, and he were trying vainly to wriggle off of it.He seemed unable to disengage himself and at length replied in a wearied and spiritless tone:
A.In two particulars only.In the first place, it was very small, having a capacity of but five or six drops, and, in the second place, it was provided with an internal spring which, when released, worked the plunger and ejected the contents with extreme rapidity.
Q.What operated this spring?
