What I have now advanced is admitted by all theologians, as appears from the following axiom of Cardinal Bellarmine, a member of your Society: "General and lawful councils are incapable of error in defining the dogmas of faith;but they may err in questions of fact." In another place he says: "The pope, as pope, and even as the head of a universal council, may err in particular controversies of fact, which depend principally on the information and testimony of men." Cardinal Baronius speaks in the same manner: "Implicit submission is due to the decisions of councils in points of faith; but, in so far as persons and their writings are concerned, the censures which have been pronounced against them have not been so rigourously observed, because there is none who may not chance to be deceived in such matters."I may add that, to prove this point, the Archbishop of Toulouse has deduced the following rule from the letters of two great popes- St.Leon and Pelagius II: "That the proper object of councils is the faith; and whatsoever is determined by them, independently of the faith, may be reviewed and examined anew: whereas nothing ought to be re-examined that has been decided in a matter of faith; because, as Tertullian observes, the rule of faith alone is immovable and irrevocable." Hence it has been seen that, while general and lawful councils have never contradicted one another in points of faith, because, as M.de Toulouse has said, "it is not allowable to examine de novo decisions in matters of faith"; several instances have occurred in which these same councils have disagreed in points of fact, where the discussion turned upon the sense of an author; because, as the same prelate observes, quoting the popes as his authorities, "everything determined in councils, not referring to the faith, may be reviewed and examined de novo." An example of this contrariety was furnished by the fourth and fifth councils, which differed in their interpretation of the same authors.The same thing happened in the case of two popes, about a proposition maintained by certain monks of Scythia.Pope Hormisdas, understanding it in a bad sense, had condemned it; but Pope John II, his successor, upon re-examining the doctrine understood it in a good sense, approved it, and pronounced it to be orthodox.Would you say that for this reason one of these popes was a heretic? And must you not consequently acknowledge that, provided a person condemn the heretical sense which a pope may have ascribed to a book, he is no heretic because he declines condemning that book, while he understands it in a sense which it is certain the pope has not condemned? If this cannot be admitted, one of these popes must have fallen into error.I have been anxious to familiarize you with these discrepancies among Catholics regarding questions of fact, which involve the understanding of the sense of a writer, showing you father against father, pope against pope, and council against council, to lead you from these to other examples of opposition, similar in their nature, but somewhat more disproportioned in respect of the parties concerned.
同类推荐
热门推荐
海内外化缘爱情的猛女
这是一部来源于生活的虚构小说,用通俗幽默的手法描述一个叫雨蝶的女人,离婚之后坎坷的爱情与婚姻生活。化缘意喻被施舍与乞求,一个女人离婚之后饱受了心理和生理的困扰,从追求爱情到生理需求,雨蝶在经历了无数伤痛和各色男人的洗礼之后,步子迈的越来越猛,从中国走向了世界,更饱尝了外国男人的无情与戏弄。海归许咏是雨蝶离婚后的第一个情人,也是让雨蝶了解中国以外的奢侈生活的一粒种子。在美国,内心充满纠结的雨蝶终于踏上那块许咏曾经生活的土地,懂得了这个男人的悲哀,也释怀了多年来基于心底的那份惆怅。这部小说的故事情节纯属虚构,无特定生活原型,若与他人雷同,必是偶然。桃花债:邪恶王爷手放开
“桃花出,真龙现。四海定,万邦归。”北苑小王爷秦流璟荒.淫好美色传说中的短命鬼、大色鬼,空生了一副风华无限的好相貌。天下大乱,皇帝无嗣,他竟有可能登上皇位!只有夭夭才知道:他是天生妖孽!常家灭门惨案;京中大活人变成木头人的怪症;敌国北燕出兵的阴谋…全都是他,妖孽祸国!