登陆注册
26300000000021

第21章 6

They differ in that 'spontaneity' is the wider term. Every result of chance is from what is spontaneous, but not everything that is from what is spontaneous is from chance.

Chance and what results from chance are appropriate to agents that are capable of good fortune and of moral action generally. Therefore necessarily chance is in the sphere of moral actions. This is indicated by the fact that good fortune is thought to be the same, or nearly the same, as happiness, and happiness to be a kind of moral action, since it is well-doing. Hence what is not capable of moral action cannot do anything by chance. Thus an inanimate thing or a lower animal or a child cannot do anything by chance, because it is incapable of deliberate intention; nor can 'good fortune' or 'ill fortune' be ascribed to them, except metaphorically, as Protarchus, for example, said that the stones of which altars are made are fortunate because they are held in honour, while their fellows are trodden under foot. Even these things, however, can in a way be affected by chance, when one who is dealing with them does something to them by chance, but not otherwise.

The spontaneous on the other hand is found both in the lower animals and in many inanimate objects. We say, for example, that the horse came 'spontaneously', because, though his coming saved him, he did not come for the sake of safety. Again, the tripod fell 'of itself', because, though when it fell it stood on its feet so as to serve for a seat, it did not fall for the sake of that.

Hence it is clear that events which (1) belong to the general class of things that may come to pass for the sake of something, (2) do not come to pass for the sake of what actually results, and (3) have an external cause, may be described by the phrase 'from spontaneity'. These 'spontaneous' events are said to be 'from chance' if they have the further characteristics of being the objects of deliberate intention and due to agents capable of that mode of action. This is indicated by the phrase 'in vain', which is used when A which is for the sake of B, does not result in B. For instance, taking a walk is for the sake of evacuation of the bowels; if this does not follow after walking, we say that we have walked 'in vain' and that the walking was 'vain'. This implies that what is naturally the means to an end is 'in vain', when it does not effect the end towards which it was the natural means-for it would be absurd for a man to say that he had bathed in vain because the sun was not eclipsed, since the one was not done with a view to the other. Thus the spontaneous is even according to its derivation the case in which the thing itself happens in vain. The stone that struck the man did not fall for the purpose of striking him; therefore it fell spontaneously, because it might have fallen by the action of an agent and for the purpose of striking. The difference between spontaneity and what results by chance is greatest in things that come to be by nature; for when anything comes to be contrary to nature, we do not say that it came to be by chance, but by spontaneity. Yet strictly this too is different from the spontaneous proper; for the cause of the latter is external, that of the former internal.

We have now explained what chance is and what spontaneity is, and in what they differ from each other. Both belong to the mode of causation 'source of change', for either some natural or some intelligent agent is always the cause; but in this sort of causation the number of possible causes is infinite.

Spontaneity and chance are causes of effects which though they might result from intelligence or nature, have in fact been caused by something incidentally. Now since nothing which is incidental is prior to what is per se, it is clear that no incidental cause can be prior to a cause per se. Spontaneity and chance, therefore, are posterior to intelligence and nature. Hence, however true it may be that the heavens are due to spontaneity, it will still be true that intelligence and nature will be prior causes of this All and of many things in it besides.

同类推荐
  • 嵩山野竹禅师录

    嵩山野竹禅师录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 考古文集

    考古文集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 象崖珽禅师语录

    象崖珽禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 三曼陀跋陀罗菩萨经

    三曼陀跋陀罗菩萨经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 金刚錍显性录

    金刚錍显性录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 大泽堂

    大泽堂

    这是陈胜吴广起义的大泽乡,讲述了一位女医的故事
  • 妖修大帝

    妖修大帝

    断脉功废,天赋仍寸。意外获得妖修秘诀,踏入不一样的修行之路。
  • 守护甜心:破碎的梦

    守护甜心:破碎的梦

    无法靠近只能不停彷徨,虽然喜欢却看着不同的地方。像是越是想要变得亲近,却越相互背离我们的心一样。无法相遇只能四处徘徊,我们就像平衡线一样。还没来得及说出来:“我只是仍然喜欢着你”。奔向时间,如果能够成为成人的话。在这荒芜的世上我会抓住你的手。虽然像靠近却只能错过。恐怕会说我们现在还太小,不会变短的我们的差距,总有一天会传达给你无法说出的话。
  • 青凰墨舞

    青凰墨舞

    至月光投下一片皎洁,垂下一叶下弦之月之时,月影盟之“云烨”离奇消失,接踵而来的是日月同升之异景,血染天际之奇观,将是浴火重生;还是随之陨落?一切将有何种未知与变数?
  • 爱在枫琥学院

    爱在枫琥学院

    我晕,被老爸无情地扔到枫琥学院就算了,毕竟那是爷爷的意思,我没意见。不过,那个可恶的家伙,不要以为我喜欢你,你就可以把我当猴耍……
  • 造化天缘

    造化天缘

    混沌之前,虚空之中有一物孕育,玄之又玄,莫可名状,曰混沌祖气,一日,祖气迸裂,渐渐演化为三千鸿蒙紫气,仅剩最中心的一丝幸免于难,紫气出,大道显,最终形成了混沌虚空,最后一丝祖气隐没与混沌之中……
  • 琉璃时光

    琉璃时光

    沪上老城区里面,王鑫鑫一家就住在这里,从小就生活在这里,早已习惯了这里的风土人情,时光如梭,母亲不幸去世,家里有天新成员,后妈刘沐带着素素成了家中的新客,与王鑫鑫相处甚好,对素素有些事情已经超出了兄妹之情,家中的房屋不断地被变卖,长大了的孩子们没有留在家里的。
  • EXO十二妖孽校草之冰恋

    EXO十二妖孽校草之冰恋

    “其实我挺爱你的,但是我又不能爱你,因为我恨你。”冰碌熙看着吴世勋说。“那你把我杀了好了。”吴世勋看着眼前这个绝美的女子,说她恨他。
  • 修罗帝少强宠爱:摄政王爷求放过

    修罗帝少强宠爱:摄政王爷求放过

    当她和他第一次见面的时候,月老就为他们牵起一缕缕丝线,一缕,两缕,三缕......丝线渐渐汇聚成了红绳,他们就注定无法割舍......林雪漫要是知道入宫会遇到他,那她铁定是不会入宫了,什么嘛,不就是长得帅点,有点钱,有点皇族血统嘛,有什么了不起的,怎么天天都能看见他。“不好好陪你的未婚妻,你到底要干什么!”“呵,你吃醋了...”才没有!!!PS:推荐一部和凡几的姐妹文哦,是小猪爱吃土豆所著的《修罗帝少强宠爱:帝少放过我》
  • 北京不相信眼泪

    北京不相信眼泪

    温亚军,现为北京武警总部某文学杂志主编。著有长篇小说伪生活等六部,小说集硬雪、驮水的日子等七部。获第三届鲁迅文学奖,第十一届庄重文文学奖,《小说选刊》《中国作家》和《上海文学》等刊物奖,入选中国小说学会排行榜。中国作家协会会员。