登陆注册
26303000000067

第67章

If, then, the definition be not clear, you should proceed to examine on lines such as these. If, on the other hand, he has phrased the definition redundantly, first of all look and see whether he has used any attribute that belongs universally, either to real objects in general, or to all that fall under the same genus as the object defined: for the mention of this is sure to be redundant. For the genus ought to divide the object from things in general, and the differentia from any of the things contained in the same genus. Now any term that belongs to everything separates off the given object from absolutely nothing, while any that belongs to all the things that fall under the same genus does not separate it off from the things contained in the same genus. Any addition, then, of that kind will be pointless.

Or see if, though the additional matter may be peculiar to the given term, yet even when it is struck out the rest of the expression too is peculiar and makes clear the essence of the term. Thus, in the definition of man, the addition 'capable of receiving knowledge' is superfluous; for strike it out, and still the expression is peculiar and makes clear his essence. Speaking generally, everything is superfluous upon whose removal the remainder still makes the term that is being defined clear. Such, for instance, would also be the definition of the soul, assuming it to be stated as a 'self-moving number'; for the soul is just 'the self-moving', as Plato defined it. Or perhaps the expression used, though appropriate, yet does not declare the essence, if the word 'number' be eliminated. Which of the two is the real state of the case it is difficult to determine clearly: the right way to treat the matter in all cases is to be guided by convenience. Thus (e.g.) it is said that the definition of phlegm is the 'undigested moisture that comes first off food'. Here the addition of the word 'undigested' is superfluous, seeing that 'the first' is one and not many, so that even when undigested' is left out the definition will still be peculiar to the subject: for it is impossible that both phlegm and also something else should both be the first to arise from the food. Or perhaps the phlegm is not absolutely the first thing to come off the food, but only the first of the undigested matters, so that the addition 'undigested' is required; for stated the other way the definition would not be true unless the phlegm comes first of all.

Moreover, see if anything contained in the definition fails to apply to everything that falls under the same species: for this sort of definition is worse than those which include an attribute belonging to all things universally. For in that case, if the remainder of the expression be peculiar, the whole too will be peculiar: for absolutely always, if to something peculiar anything whatever that is true be added, the whole too becomes peculiar. Whereas if any part of the expression do not apply to everything that falls under the same species, it is impossible that the expression as a whole should be peculiar: for it will not be predicated convertibly with the object; e.g. 'a walking biped animal six feet high': for an expression of that kind is not predicated convertibly with the term, because the attribute 'six feet high' does not belong to everything that falls under the same species.

Again, see if he has said the same thing more than once, saying (e.g.) 'desire' is a 'conation for the pleasant'. For 'desire' is always 'for the pleasant', so that what is the same as desire will also be 'for the pleasant'. Accordingly our definition of desire becomes 'conation-for-the-pleasant': for the word 'desire' is the exact equivalent of the words 'conation for-the-pleasant', so that both alike will be 'for the pleasant'. Or perhaps there is no absurdity in this; for consider this instance:-Man is a biped': therefore, what is the same as man is a biped: but 'a walking biped animal' is the same as man, and therefore walking biped animal is a biped'. But this involves no real absurdity. For 'biped' is not a predicate of 'walking animal': if it were, then we should certainly have 'biped' predicated twice of the same thing; but as a matter of fact the subject said to be a biped is'a walking biped animal', so that the word 'biped' is only used as a predicate once. Likewise also in the case of 'desire' as well: for it is not 'conation' that is said to be 'for the pleasant', but rather the whole idea, so that there too the predication is only made once. Absurdity results, not when the same word is uttered twice, but when the same thing is more than once predicated of a subject; e.g. if he says, like Xenocrates, that wisdom defines and contemplates reality:' for definition is a certain type of contemplation, so that by adding the words 'and contemplates' over again he says the same thing twice over.

Likewise, too, those fail who say that 'cooling' is 'the privation of natural heat'. For all privation is a privation of some natural attribute, so that the addition of the word 'natural' is superfluous: it would have been enough to say 'privation of heat', for the word 'privation' shows of itself that the heat meant is natural heat.

Again, see if a universal have been mentioned and then a particular case of it be added as well, e.g. 'Equity is a remission of what is expedient and just'; for what is just is a branch of what is expedient and is therefore included in the latter term: its mention is therefore redundant, an addition of the particular after the universal has been already stated. So also, if he defines 'medicine' as 'knowledge of what makes for health in animals and men', or 'the law' as 'the image of what is by nature noble and just'; for what is just is a branch of what is noble, so that he says the same thing more than once.

同类推荐
  • 法幢远禅师语录

    法幢远禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Beasts, Men and Gods

    Beasts, Men and Gods

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 三宜盂禅师语录

    三宜盂禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 雷峰塔

    雷峰塔

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 百花历

    百花历

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 拽千金的霸道恶少

    拽千金的霸道恶少

    浠宝是新手希望大家支持被父母送出国,又莫名其妙的回来四个MM遇见四个GG这么巧,自己的老哥也是校草会擦出什么火花呢
  • 军人丧尸世界大战

    军人丧尸世界大战

    作为一名即将退伍的士兵,怀揣着回家创大业的梦想和激情准备重新回归社会。怎料世界风云突变,一场病毒24小时内摧毁全世界,70亿人和无数动物变为食人恶魔!这名士兵和战友们奋战除魔的一线战场,奋勇作战也无力回天,眼看着山河破碎,世界崩溃。无奈叹息,脱离了军队,开启了回家之旅。历经千难万险,横穿地狱般的中华大地,最终回归军营,为拯救世界贡献自己的力量,带领着战友兄弟们继续完成参军报国的使命!
  • 我被世界游戏化

    我被世界游戏化

    一觉醒来,竟然发现自己变成了女身,坑爹的系统接踵而来,忘泉的镜花水月,灵山的生死情仇,叶灵的身世之谜。现实与异界的交锋,神秘的面纱也将慢慢揭开……注,单身暧昧文。
  • The Purcell Papers

    The Purcell Papers

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 龙眠

    龙眠

    这是一个奋发的东方玄幻故事,一个魔法与武术冲突的故事,也是一个复仇的故事。在魔法荼毒东方世界的年代,武者的坚守和奋斗,弥足珍贵。主角惨遭灭门,在寻找真相和凶手的路上,奋勇成长,最终崛起于这片洪荒世界。
  • 流年影长

    流年影长

    男神大人?扑倒之!青梅竹马?领证去!竹马兼男神?妥妥的另一半啊!韩绯所爱之人,既是她的青梅竹马,也是她从小到大的男神。男神内心独白【她绯红如血鲜衣怒马,他携手相伴追随天涯!】这是一只腹黑大灰狼攻略小白兔,开窍的小白兔心甘情愿投怀送抱,继而携手撒狗粮的甜宠故事。
  • 三分做事七分做人的49个关键(上)

    三分做事七分做人的49个关键(上)

    本书论述了人生成败的道理,包括要想成事,先学做人;做事先做人,得意不忘形;立业要先立德,品格终于能力;有容乃大,忍者无敌;做事急噪乃大忌,做人低调实高贤等内容。
  • 科拟之夜半钟声

    科拟之夜半钟声

    短篇,耽美。成文日期是很久以前。我的数物向第一个短篇作品。有人说,科学是高深又美丽的学问。在我眼中,亦然。数学,自然科学的工具与基石。物理学,自然科学的先驱。不知大家有没有想过他们作为人类的形态,会上演怎样的故事
  • 繁枝

    繁枝

    一切都是从珑珑的课业项目开始的。当忙碌了一天的立蕙被珑珑唤到起居室,观赏他手绘的"家庭树"时,她完全没有想到,那些珑珑用彩笔画出的枝叶里,竟藏着如许多的人和事。
  • 极致男人在东北

    极致男人在东北

    两年前的一场空难,夺走了他挚爱的老婆和孩子们的生命,这让他对生活和女人都有了重新的理解和认识。而突如其来要到东北任职的消息让他惊讶不已,但是他没有拒绝,而是选择了去,因为他想换个环境,重新整理心情再次出发。他不知道他到了东北之后又将会面临怎样的一种环境,又会遇到哪些事,甚至是与哪些女人再有情感纠葛……一切都是未知的,但是一切也都是新鲜的,他很期待,期待着未知的新生活。