The pleasant feature of these trips was the great educational work accomplished for the people through their listening to lectures on all the vital questions of the hour. Wherever any of us chanced to be on Sunday， we preached in some church； and wherever I had a spare afternoon， I talked to women alone， on marriage， maternity， and the laws of life and health. We made many most charming acquaintances， too， scattered all over our Western World， and saw how comfortable and happy sensible people could be， living in most straitened circumstances， with none of the luxuries of life. If most housekeepers could get rid of one-half their clothes and furniture and put their bric-a-brac in the town museum， life would be simplified and they would begin to know what leisure means. When I see so many of our American women struggling to be artists， who cannot make a good loaf of bread nor a palatable cup of coffee， I think of what Theodore Parker said when art was a craze in Boston. "The fine arts do not interest me so much as the coarse arts which feed， clothe， house， and comfort a people. I would rather be a great man like Franklin than a Michael Angelo杗ay， if I had a son， I should rather see him a mechanic， like the late George Stephenson， in England， than a great painter like Rubens， who only copied beauty."
One day I found at the office of the Revolution an invitation to meet Mrs. Moulton in the Academy of Music， where she was to try her voice for the coming concert for the benefit of the Woman's Medical College.
And what a voice for power， pathos， pliability！ I never heard the like.
Seated beside her mother， Mrs. W. H. Greenough， I enjoyed alike the mother's anxious pride and the daughter's triumph. I felt， as I listened， the truth of what Vieuxtemps said the first time he heard her， "That is the traditional voice for which the ages have waited and longed." When， on one occasion， Mrs. Moulton sang a song of Mozart's to Auber's accompaniment， someone present asked， "What could be added to make this more complete？" Auber looked up to heaven， and， with a sweet smile， said， "Nothing but that Mozart should have been here to listen." Looking and listening， "Here，" thought I， "is another jewel in the crown of womanhood， to radiate and glorify the lives of all." I have such an intense pride of *** that the triumphs of woman in art， literature， oratory， science or song rouse my enthusiasm as nothing else can.
Hungering， that day， for gifted women， I called on Alice and Phebe Cary and Mary Clemmer Ames， and together we gave the proud white male such a serving up as did our souls good and could not hurt him， intrenched， as he is， behind creeds， codes， customs， and constitutions， with vizor and breastplate of self-complacency and conceit. In criticising Jessie Boucherett's essay on "Superfluous Women，" in which she advises men in England to emigrate in order to leave room and occupation for women， the Tribune said：
"The idea of a home without a man in it！" In visiting the Carys one always felt that there was a home朼 very charming one， too杦ithout a man in it.
Once when Harriet Beecher Stowe was at Dr. Taylor's， I had the opportunity to make her acquaintance. In her sanctum， surrounded by books and papers， she was just finishing her second paper on the Byron family， and her sister Catherine was preparing papers on her educational work， preparatory to a coming meeting of the ladies of the school board. The women of the Beecher family， though most of them wives and mothers， all had a definite life-work outside the family circle， and other objects of intense interest besides husbands， babies， cook stoves， and social conversations. Catherine said she was opposed to woman suffrage， and if she thought there was the least danger of our getting it， she would write and talk against it vehemently.
But， as the nation was safe against such a calamity， she was willing to let the talk go on， because the agitation helped her work. "It is rather paradoxical，" I said to her， "that the pressing of a false principle can help a true one； but when you get the women all thoroughly educated， they will step off to the polls and vote in spite of you."
One night on the train from New York to Williamsport， Pennsylvania， I found abundant time to think over the personal peculiarities of the many noble women who adorn this nineteenth century， and， as I recalled them， one by one， in America， England， France， and Germany， and all that they are doing and saying， I wondered that any man could be so blind as not to see that woman has already taken her place as the peer of man. While the lords of creation have been debating her sphere and drawing their chalk marks here and there， woman has quietly stepped outside the barren fields where she has been compelled to graze for centuries， and is now in green pastures and beside still waters， a power in the world of thought.
These pleasant cogitations were cut short by my learning that I had taken the wrong train， and must change at Harrisburg at two o'clock in the morning. How soon the reflection that I must leave my comfortable berth at such an unchristian hour changed the whole hue of glorious womanhood and every other earthly blessing！ However， I lived through the trial and arrived at Williamsport as the day dawned. I had a good audience at the opera house that evening， and was introduced to many agreeable people， who declared themselves converted to woman suffrage by my ministrations.
Among the many new jewels in my crown， I added， that night， Judge Bently.
In November， 1869， I passed one night in Philadelphia， with Miss Anthony， at Anna Dickinson's home朼 neat， three-story brick house in Locust Street.
