I proceed to notice one or two more contrivances by which theancient trammels of proprietary right were more or lesssuccessfully relaxed, premising that the scheme of this treatiseonly permits me to mention those which are of great antiquity. Onone of them in particular it is necessary to dwell for a momentor two, because persons unacquainted with the early history oflaw will not be easily persuaded that a principle, of whichmodern jurisprudence has very slowly and with the greatestdifficulty obtained the recognition, was really familiar to thevery infancy of legal science. There is no principle in all lawwhich the moderns, in spite of its beneficial character, havebeen so loath to adopt and to carry to its legitimateconsequences as that which was known to the Romans as Usucapion,and which has descended to modern jurisprudence under the name ofPrescription. It was a positive rule of the oldest Roman law, arule older than the Twelve Tables, that commodities which hadbeen uninterruptedly possessed for a certain period became theproperty of the possessor. The period of possession wasexceedingly short one or two years according to the nature of thecommodities and in historical times Usucapion was only allowed tooperate when possession had commenced in a particular way; but Ithink it likely that at a less advanced epoch possession wasconverted into ownership under conditions even less severe thanwe read of in our authorities. As I have said before, I am farfrom asserting that the respect of men for de facto possession isa phenomenon which jurisprudence can account for by itself, butit is very necessary to remark that primitive societies, inadopting the principle of Usucapion, were not beset with any ofthe speculative doubts and hesitations which have impeded itsreception among the moderns. Prescriptions were viewed by themodern lawyers, first with repugnance, afterwards with reluctantapproval. In several countries, including our own, legislationlong declined to advance beyond the rude device of barring allactions based on a wrong which had been suffered earlier than afixed point of time in the past, generally the first year of somepreceding reign; nor was it till the middle ages had finallyclosed, and James the First had ascended the throne of England,that we obtained a true statute of limitation of a very imperfectkind. This tardiness in copying one of the most famous chaptersof Roman law, which was no doubt constantly read by the majorityof European lawyers, the modern world owes to the influence ofthe Canon Law. The ecclesiastical customs out of which the CanonLaw grew, concerned as they were with sacred or quasi-sacredinterests, very naturally regarded the privileges which theyconferred as incapable of being lost through disuse howeverprolonged; and in accordance with this view, the spiritualjurisprudence, when afterwards consolidated, was distinguished bya marked leaning against Prescriptions. It was the fate of theCanon Law when held up by the clerical lawyers as a pattern tosecular legislation, to have a peculiar influence on firstprinciples. It gave to the bodies of custom which were formedthroughout Europe far fewer express rules than did the Roman law,but then it seems to have communicated a bias to professionalopinion on a surprising number of fundamental points, and thetendencies thus produced progressively gained strength as eachsystem was developed. One of the dispositions it produced was adisrelish for Prescriptions; but I do not know that thisprejudice would have operated as powerfully as it has done, if ithad not fallen in with the doctrine of the scholastic jurists ofthe realist sect, who taught that, whatever turn actuallegislation might take, a right, how long soever neglected, wasin point of fact indestructible. The remains of this state offeeling still exist. Wherever the philosophy of law is earnestlydiscussed, questions respecting the speculative basis ofPrescription are always hotly disputed; and it is still a pointof the greatest interest in France and Germany, whether a personwho has been out of possession for a series of years is deprivedof his ownership as a penalty for his neglect, or loses itthrough the summary interposition of the law in its desire tohave afinis litium. But no such scruples troubled the mind ofearly Roman society. Their ancient usages directly took away theownership of everybody who had been out of possession, undercertain circumstances, during one or two year. What was the exacttenor of the rule of Usucapion in its earliest shape, it is noteasy to say; but, taken with the limitations which we findattending it in the books, it was a most useful security againstthe mischiefs of a too cumbrous system of conveyance. In order tohave the benefit of Usucapion, it was necessary that the adversepossession should have begun in good faith, that is, with beliefon the part of the possessor that he was lawfully acquiring theproperty, and it was farther required that the commodity shouldhave been transferred to him by some mode of alienation which,however unequal to conferring a complete title in the particularcase, was at least recognised by the law. In the case thereforeof a Mancipation, however slovenly the performance might havebeen, yet if it had been carried so far as to involve a Traditionor Delivery, the vice of the title would be cured by Usucapion intwo years at most. I know nothing in the practice of the Romanswhich testifies so strongly to their legal genius as the usewhich they made of Usucapion. The difficulties which beset themwere nearly the same with those which embarrassed and stillembarrass the lawyers of England. Owing to the complexity oftheir system, which as yet they had neither the courage nor thepower to reconstruct, actual right was constantly gettingdivorced from technical right, the equitable ownership from thelegal. But Usucapion, as manipulated by the jurisconsults,supplied a self-acting machinery, by which the defects of titlesto property were always in course of being cured, and by whichthe ownerships that were temporarily separated were again rapidlycemented together with the briefest possible delay. Usucapion didnot lose its advantages till the reforms of Justinian. But assoon as law and equity had been completely fused, and whenMancipation ceased to be the Roman conveyance, there was nofurther necessity for the ancient contrivance, and Usucapion,with its periods of time considerably lengthened, became thePrescription which has at length been adopted by nearly allsystems of modern law.
同类推荐
热门推荐
中国人民解放军军官军衔条例
为加强法制宣传,迅速普及法律知识,服务于我国民主法制建设,多年来,中国民主法制出版社根据全国人大常委会每年定期审议通过、修订的法律,全品种、大规模的出版了全国人民代表大会常务委员会公报版的系列法律单行本。该套法律单行本经过最高立法机关即全国人民代表大会常务委员会的权威审定,法条内容准确无误,文本格式规范合理,多年来受到了社会各界广泛关注与好评。毒舌律师,追妻一百天
安璟,普通高中老师;楚钧,专注离婚案子的知名律师,他们在相识一百天结婚,在一百天后离婚,然后,大律师发誓要在一百天后复婚。追妻的道路情敌辈出,温文尔雅的教授,青春彪悍的学生,更有总裁姐夫弟弟的小舅子的二伯父的三侄子的四表哥。大律师怂了,大律师灰心了,那怎么可能!!楚大律师一拍桌子,安二丫你听着,再给我一百天,追不回来你我绕着中心广场裸奔三百圈!这是一个善良优雅偶尔犯二的老师和一个专注离婚官司二十年的腹黑大律师离婚再复婚的温暖搞笑偶尔小虐的故事。爱情需要相信,婚姻需要经营,小妖精们,干吧!【情节虚构,请勿模仿】